Here's a nice distinction between two kinds of technology from Theodore Kaczynski's "Industrial Society and Its Future":
"We distinguish between two kinds of technology, which we will call small-scale technology and organization-dependent technology. Small-scale technology is technology that can be used by small-scale communities without outside assistance. Organization-dependent technology is technology that depends on large-scale social organization. We are aware of no significant cases of regression in small-scale technology. But organization-dependent technology DOES regress when the social organization on which it depends breaks down. Example: When the Roman Empire fell apart the Romans' small-scale technology survived because any clever village craftsman could build, for instance, a water wheel, any skilled smith could make steel by Roman methods, and so forth. But the Romans' organization-dependent technology DID regress. Their aqueducts fell into disrepair and were never rebuilt. Their techniques of road construction were lost. The Roman system of urban sanitation was forgotten, so that only until rather recent times did the sanitation of European cities equal that of Ancient Rome.
"The reason why technology has seemed always to progress is that, until perhaps a century or two before the Industrial Revolution, most technology was small-scale technology. But most of the technology developed since the Industrial Revolution is organization-dependent technology. Take the refrigerator for example. Without factory-made parts or the facilities of a post-industrial machine shop it would be virtually impossible for a handful of local craftsmen to build a refrigerator. If by some miracle they did succeed in building one it would be useless to them without a reliable source of electric power. So they would have to dam a stream and build a generator. Generators require large amounts of copper wire. Imagine trying to make that wire without modern machinery. And where would they get a gas suitable for refrigeration? It would be much easier to build an ice house or preserve food by drying or picking, as was done before the invention of the refrigerator."
Other good sections are the part where Kaczynski profiles leftists as "oversocialized" individuals and the part where he talks about the profusion of increasingly empty "surrogate activities" in an industrialized society in order to feed the natural human desire to accomplish meaningful work.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Isn't Ted Kaczynski the Unabomber?
Yes, and an anarcho-primitivist neo-luddite to boot. "Industrial Society and Its Future" is considered his manifesto.
He's a much better writer than most reclusive sociopath bomb-makers.
Love the bomb-maker, hate the bomb...
until the US government decides there is no need to be a global superpower and ceases to let the market dictate, demand for more "efficient and effective" technology will continue to increase (phasing out small-scale, old tech).
if i recall correctly, the US population has increased from 100m in the late 60s to 300m+ today. most of these citizens are of the under-educated, over-working type (employed by the government entities & by multinational corporations). for these "american poor" (including all those who think they are financially moderate citizens who, in actuality, must support massive mortgages and other debt) to "remain", they must continue serving The Man. and this means less time to do household things, and thus they buy whatever appliances supposedly make their lives easier.
the "division" is growing indeed - between the rich and the poor. most companies, small and large, are being "forced" by shareholders (all financial institutions) to outsource. if they don't, they go bankrupt.
Post a Comment